Once again, the
Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir is convulsed in lethal violence pitting
stone-throwing youths against armed police officers and security forces. The
unrest is a major setback for peace in the long-troubled region claimed by
both India and Pakistan, where an insurgency movement peaked in the 1990s, then
waned, but never completely disappeared.
The trigger was the
killing on July 8 by Indian security forces of Burhan Muzaffar Wani, a
charismatic, 22-year-old separatist who wanted an independent Kashmir and had
built up a following on social media among disaffected Indian Kashmiri youth.
Since Mr. Wani’s death, some 40 people have been killed, including one police
officer, during confrontations between protesters and security forces.
Thousands have been injured, many by pellet guns wielded by the police and
security forces as a crude form of crowd control. Kashmir’s hospitals are
overwhelmed, and more than 100 people, mostly young, are threatened
with blindness by pellets lodged in their eyes.
Meanwhile, many
Kashmiris are living in a state of siege, under a strict curfew with access to
basic communication — including cellular, landline and internet services — cut
off by authorities. On Saturday, police raidednewspaper offices in
Kashmir, and state authorities banned publication for three days, a measure
that is profoundly troubling in democratic India.
A major cause of the uprising
is the resentment among Kashmiri youths who have come of age under an Indian
security apparatus that acts against civilians with impunity. Kashmir is
subject to India’s Armed Forces Special Powers Act, or Afspa, which grants the
military wide powers to arrest, shoot to kill, occupy or destroy property. The
result is a culture of brutal disdain for the local population.
Troubling questions
about the timing and the circumstances of Mr. Wani’s death remain unanswered.
So too are questions about the apparently indiscriminate use of pellet guns.
These and other questions argue for an independent investigation into the use
of force by security forces, and for the reform of practices — including
censorship, communications blackouts, and those allowed by Afspa – that are
unworthy of India’s democracy.
A failure to take
these steps will only push more young Kashmiris into militancy, and make
impossible a political solution that alone can bring an end to the desperation
that has, once again, gripped the region.
No comments:
Post a Comment