By Sajjad Shaukat
Under the pretext of
American so-called counterinsurgency programme, and by implementing the
anti-Muslim policy of his predecessor, the US President Barack Obama has broken
all the record of human rights by extrajudicial killings of the innocent people
through CIA-operated drone attacks in Afghanistan, Somalia, Yemen etc. in
general and Pakistan in particular, while, the United States claims to be
protector of human rights not only inside the country, but also all over the
world.
On March 11, 2014, Ben Emmerson, UN Special Rapporteur on Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights, who conducted
an investigation into targeted killings, and examined legality of drone
strikes, presented his report on drone strikes
to the UN Human Rights Council (HRC). His report examined 37 drone strikes as
sample—the US, UK and Israel have launched in Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan,
Yemen, Somalia and Gaza, which resulted into civilian casualties. Emmerson
told the HRC, “These strikes require a legal duty on the relevant states to
provide…a justification for the use of deadly force…to disclose the results of
their own fact finding inquiries,why no such inquiries have taken place.”
Emmerson
also referred to an interactive website, produced by Forensic Architecture team
which marked the location of 30 drone strikes which helped in his final report.
In this
context, Professor Eyal Weizman, the Principal Investigator of the Forensic
Architecture project said, “Studying buildings hit by drones reveal much of
consequences of a strike. The work we do is essential because states
undertaking drone strikes, such as the US and Israel, attempt to hide actions
and even deny them outright.”
However, CIA-operated illegal drone attacks in Pakistan cannot be seen in
isolation, as these strikes are part of the US-led covert aims against this
only nuclear country in the Islamic World.
May 21, 2016, the
CIA-operated drone strike killed the Chief of the Afghan Taliban Mullah Akhtar
Mansour in Nushki, Balochistan. After the incident, Afghan Taliban leaders refused
to participate in the US-sponsored talks with the Afghan government. Notably,
in the recent past, with the help of Pakistan, a series of meetings were held
in Islamabad and Kabul among the representatives of Pakistan, Afghanistan,
China and the US to develop an understanding for the earliest possible
resumption of stalled talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban with
view to ending nearly 15 years of bloodshed in Afghanistan. For the purpose, a
number of the meetings were also held among Pakistan, America, China and
Afghanistan. This latest strike by the US predator in Balochistan
province gave a greater setback to peace process for Afghanistan under the
Quadrilateral Coordination Group framework, which started in Murree with strenuous
efforts of Islamabad.
On June 10, this year, a
high-level delegation of the US visited Islamabad and met Pakistan’s Chief of
the Army Staff Gen. Raheel Sharif and Adviser to the Prime Minister Nawaz
Sharif on Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz Adviser separately.
During the meeting,
expressing his serious concern on the US drone attack
in Balochistan as a violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty, Chief of
Army Staff, Gen. Raheel Sharif highlighted as to how it had impacted
the mutual trust and was counterproductive in consolidating the gains of
Operation Zarb-e-Azb. Gen. Raheel Sharif by elaborated, “All
stakeholders need to understand Pakistan’s challenges…inter-tribal linkages and
decades-old presence of over three million refugees…blaming Pakistan for
instability in Afghanistan is unfortunate…target TTP [Tehreek-i-Taliban
Pakistan] and its chief Mullah Fazlullah in their bases in
Afghanistan—Indian RAW and NDS [Afghan National Directorate of Security]
are fomenting terrorism in Pakistan which is committed to work for a long term
peace process for Afghanistan under the Quadrilateral Coordination Group
framework.”
On the one hand,
Washington has demanded Pakistan’s support for dialogue with the Afghan
Taliban, while targeted Taliban Chief Mullah Akhtar Mansour with drone, putting
Islamabad in to a difficult position. In fact, these are part of American
double game to destabilize Pakistan in order to obtain the secret goals of
America, India and Israel.
The US has always
preferred New Delhi over Islamabad. In this regard, during the recent visit of
the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to America, addressing the media
jointly, Prime Minister Modi said “I am thankful for the help and support that
my friend Barack Obama has extended with regard to India’s membership of the
Missile Technology Control Regime and Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG).”
America has been backing
Indian hegemony in Asia to counterbalance China. During President Obama’s
second visit to India, the US and India announced a breakthrough on a pact which
would allow American companies to supply New Delhi with civilian nuclear
technology, as agreed upon in 2008. This duplicity has initiated a dangerous
arms race between Pakistan and India, and between China and India.
Setting aside the Indian
irresponsible record of non-proliferation, and safety of nuclear arms, Washington also pressurized the International
Atomic Agency (IAEA) to sign an accord of specific safeguards with India.
America had already contacted the NSG to grant a waiver to India for starting
civil nuclear trade on larger scale.
Undoubtedly,
unlike India, Pakistan’s nuclear assets are in safe hands—well-protected and
are under tight security arrangements, having the best command and control
system. However, taking cognizance of the US double standard, China and some
responsible countries have decided to oppose in the meeting of the NSG to grant a waiver to India in this
regard.
Indian desperation in
Afghanistan is increasing in the backdrop of growing engagements of Islamabad,
Kabul, Beijing and Washington. Therefore, by arranging terror-assaults in
Pakistan and Afghanistan, New Delhi is also sabotaging the peace process between
the Afghan officials and representatives of Tehreek-e-Taliban Afghanistan.
Based in Afghanistan,
American CIA, Indian RAW and Israeli Mossad which are well-penetrated in the
ISIS and the TTP are using the militants of these terrorist outfits to destabilize
Tibetan regions of China, Iranian Sistan-Baluchistan and Pakistan’s province of
Balochistan by arranging the subversive activities. In this connection, the
China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is their special target. Collectively
or individually, these intelligence agencies are also assisting Jundullah
(God’s soldiers)—the Sunni militant group which is active in Balochistan
against Shias.
Based in the Afghan
provinces of Kunar and Nuristan, Mullah Fazlullah, chief of the TTP is running
a parallel government in Afghanistan. The militants of this group have their
own legal system and own authority, exercising strict control.
It is notable that
Pakistan’s Armed Forces broke the backbone of the militants through military
operation Zarb-i-Azb—killing thousands of insurgents including foreign
terrorists, while, primary intelligence agency ISI and other law-enforcing
agencies captured several terrorists in various regions of Pakistan. Therefore,
the aim of the drone strike is to thwart, the success of Pakistan, achieved
against terrorists.
These strikes by the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) which started
on Pakistan’s tribal areas during the Bush era in 2004, intensified under the
Obama Administration.
It is mentionable that in 2013, first time, a US Senator
Lindsey Graham, a staunch supporter of the predator attacks, openly admitted
that 4,700 people have been killed by the raids of America’s secretive drone
war. The number exceeds some independent estimates of the death toll.
According to the research
of London-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism, “Between June
2004 and September 2012, these unmanned aerial vehicles killed between 2,562
and 3,325 people in Pakistan, of whom between 474 and 881 were civilians
including 176 children.” In this respect, in a report, The Guardian disclosed
on August 11, 2011, “The CIA claims that there has been not one non-combatant
killed in the past year…it is a bleak view: more people killed than previously
thought.”
But, details collected
by the Pakistani journalists show that civilian casualties through unmanned
aircraft are higher as indicated by the US officials—more than 5000 innocent
civilians and only 22 Al-Qaeda commanders have been killed by these aerial
attacks.
In fact, American such a
duplicity contains many other covert designs. America wants to provoke the
tribal people against Pakistan’s security forces. The US drone campaign could
give a setback to the democratic system in Pakistan. Its another aim is to
create a rift between Pakistan’s armed forces and the elected government on one
side and opposition parties including general masses on the other.
And the US seeks to
incite the tribal people to join the militant outfits and to conduct terror
attacks inside Pakistan. In this respect, a report of the New America
Foundation revealed, “When the US drones attack Pakistan’s tribal areas, it is
not just the 10, or 50 innocent civilians they kill, these killings provide
reason to the youngsters for joining terrorist groups waging war against US and
of course Pakistan…while killing 10 militants, the US has murdered more than
1400 Pakistanis, not involved in any terrorist activities. Could it not imply
that it gave birth to another 1400 militants?”
Based on research, a
report, “Living Under Drones,” prepared by experts from Stanford Law School and
the New York University School of Law had revealed that the US campaign of
drone “strikes in Pakistan’s northwestern tribal belt is terrorizing civilians
24 hours a day and breeding bitter anti-American sentiment…have killed
thousands of people…even stopping their children going to school for fear of
being targeted.” The report urged Washington to rethink its drone strategy,
arguing it was counterproductive and undermined international law.
The New York Time on May
26, 2011, disclosed, “President Obama has become personally involved in
the process” and “has normalized extrajudicial killings from the Oval Office,
taking advantage of America’s temporary advantage in drone technology. Without
the scrutiny of the legislature, Obama is authorizing murder on a weekly
basis.”
While justifying these
air strikes by the spy planes, counterterrorism advisor to Obama,
John Brennan who had faced a Senate confirmation hearing for his nominee as CIA
director is the main player, advising Obama on which strike, he should approve.
Although he has defended attacks by the CIA-controlled unmanned planes by
justifying their success in eliminating Al Qaeda militants, yet these strikes
are proving counterproductive for Pakistan.
Nevertheless, setting
aside the parliament resolution, rallies and processions of Pakistan’s
political and religious parties, while ignoring the Pak-US rapprochement, and
without bothering for any internal backlash, these aerial attacks have kept on
going on the tribal regions.
Now, trust deficit has
deepened between Pakistan and the US since May 21, 2016, when the CIA-operated
drone strike killed the Chief of the Afghan Taliban Mullah Akhtar Mansour in
Balochistan.
US ex-presidents, Jimmy
Carter and Bill Clinton have opposed Obama’s faulty drone strategy. Even,
Secretary of State John Kerry has also criticized unabated use of unilateral
drones in Pakistan, saying, “US engagement with the world is not
just about drones.”
Apart from widespread
criticism from some US allies and human rights groups which have remarked that
these aerial attacks are illegal and unethical, and violation of the targeted
countries’ sovereignty, the United Nations Charter, universal declaration of
human rights and international law, the US warrior President Obama remains
obstinate to continue extrajudicial killings through CIA-operated drones so as
to fulfil the covert aims of the US-led countries.
Sajjad Shaukat writes on
international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants,
Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations
Email:
sajjad_logic@yahoo.com
No comments:
Post a Comment